In this guide, I'll walk you through 4 accounts payable software options for property management
The North American property management market hit $8.59 billion in 2024, and it's expected to climb past $16.5 billion by 2032. That kind of growth is exciting, but the back office isn't keeping up. Specifically, the accounting side of property management is still painfully outdated in many firms. 68% of AP teams still key invoice data manually into their ERPs while 37% of companies still rely on paper invoices. And from my experience, property management accounting is more complex than accounting in just about any other business I've worked in.
You've got a mountain of vendor bills, service contracts, utilities, and unexpected expenses. You know exactly when contractors need their checks, but somehow those payments never make it out on time. I've watched this destroy relationships with good vendors and kill chances at getting better rates. But the real problem isn't you or your team. It's your broken workflow. You're chasing paper invoices that pass through multiple hands, needing approvals from board members, regional managers, or finance leads.
That alone can delay payments by weeks. Most small to mid-sized companies take 25 days to process one invoice from start to finish. That's almost a month for something that should take days. Late fees pile up, you miss early payment discounts, and vendors start questioning your reliability. Now factor in the cost. Between the labor, paper shuffling, approvals, and potential errors, you're spending roughly $15 per invoice, depending on how much time your staff is burning on it.
I saw one company where two $40/hour staff members spent 40 hours processing invoices for 150 properties. The real cost per invoice was about $21. But I've also seen the flip side. Property managers who switched to automated accounts payable systems cut their processing time to 3-5 days. The Institute of Finance & Management found automation drops costs to about $3 per invoice. That's an 80% reduction in both time and money.
However, not all AP systems are created equal, though. Some are better for property management, others for real estate. Some focus more on workflow and approvals, while others integrate better with accounting platforms like QuickBooks, Yardi, or NetSuite. In the rest of this guide, I'll walk you through 4 accounts payable software options for property management, options that I've either used myself or evaluated seriously.
Most property management firms, whether big or small, follow a similar basic flow: receive the invoice, match it with a PO or contract, get approvals, and then pay it. The way you execute that process might vary, but the bones are the same. That's why AP automation works so well across the board, no matter your setup. In fact, most modern platforms use AI to read and understand documents like humans.
The process starts when invoices get into your system electronically. Maybe they come in through a vendor portal, maybe they're emailed in bulk, or maybe you're scanning paper invoices into a digital format. The software validates everything against your master data and matches invoices to purchase orders and delivery receipts. When everything checks out, it routes approvals and processes payments automatically. With built-in AI and cloud connectivity, today's systems adapt and learn from your specific workflows.
Over time, the software handles complex scenarios that would easily crash the old automation tools that used to follow rigid rules and break down whenever you threw them anything off script. But even with AI, not all modern automation platforms are created equal. Some are great with complex portfolios, others integrate beautifully with certain accounting systems. Some are cost-effective for small teams, while others are built for enterprise-level operations. So, how do you choose the right one? Well, let's break down the most important factors.
Before jumping into automation, get clear on what matters most for your firm. I've seen people rush into buying software that doesn't even work with their ERP, or worse, it does, but the integration is constantly breaking. That's not saving time. That's adding headaches. So, here are some evaluation criteria that will help you understand whether the software fits your existing company size and setup.
Your ERP system is where you store vendor information, purchase orders, general ledger codes, and payment records. It's where transactions get recorded and reports get generated. However, most ERP systems weren't built to handle the daily grind of accounts payable. They can't extract line-item details from invoices using OCR. They don't catch duplicate invoices or automatically route approvals. They can't match invoices to purchase orders or delivery receipts. On the other hand, the AP software handles the operational heavy lifting:
As you can tell from the work each software does, these systems should work together, not replace each other. The integration creates one smooth workflow from invoice capture to final payment without spreadsheets, emails, or manual data transfer from one software to the other. Here's a quick breakdown of the integration types to look for:
From my experience, API and native integrations are the most efficient in the long run. They keep your data in sync and cut down on maintenance.
I've been in property management long enough to know that what works when you're managing several units won't work when you're managing hundreds of units. As your business grows, you'll be dealing with more properties, more vendors, more staff needing access, more approval levels, thousands of invoices, and likely more legal entities. If your AP automation software can't scale alongside your firm, you're setting yourself up for a costly and disruptive switch down the road.
That's why I always recommend choosing a platform that's built to handle the kind of growth you're aiming for, not just where you are today. The software should be able to manage increasing invoice loads, additional users, and multi-level approval workflows without hiccups. It should let you add new properties, handle different currencies if you expand markets, and maintain speed. But here's where many firms make a mistake: they don't look closely at the vendor's actual track record.
It's one thing for a software company to say we're scalable. It's another thing to show that they've successfully supported other property management firms as they've scaled from regional to national. Here's my golden rule: past performance predicts future success. Before you buy into the pitch, you want to see that they've successfully handled property management firms similar to your size, and bigger ones too.
The number of active clients matters too. For example, a vendor with 20+ satisfied customers has more staying power compared to a vendor serving 2 clients only. They've weathered different market conditions and refined their product through real-world feedback.
Some AP solutions require white-glove service with dedicated specialists walking you through every step. Others are truly plug-and-play. But even the most intuitive systems need proper implementation, training, and ongoing assistance, especially if your team isn't deeply technical. Once you're up and running, things don't stop there.
You'll eventually hit bugs, updates, and user issues. Evaluate response time when problems hit. How fast does the vendor acknowledge support tickets? Top-tier vendors acknowledge issues within hours and provide escalation paths for urgent problems. They have resources standing by to work on critical issues or provide workarounds while permanent fixes get developed. They push out regular updates, security patches, and feature improvements. I recommend vendors who provide:
If you've ever tried shopping for AP automation software, you already know this: pricing is rarely straightforward. Every vendor structures their fees differently, making true apples-to-apples comparisons nearly impossible. That's because pricing depends on a mix of factors, such as features, invoice volume, number of users, how complex your setup is, and how much support and customization you'll need.
From what I've seen, most vendors don't hand out a flat price. Instead, they'll offer tiered pricing based on your requirements. This flexibility lets you pay for what you actually need while leaving room for growth. However, if you know how pricing models work, you'll be in a better spot to ask the right questions and avoid nasty surprises later. Here's a breakdown of the most common AP pricing structures:
That said, let's get into the 4 accounts payable software options for property management.
LeapAP is designed specifically for property and community management companies. You can use the software to manage a mixed portfolio of condos, HOAs, commercial spaces, and rental properties. The main promise of LeapAP is reducing accounts payable costs by up to 80% while scaling without additional hires. The software automates the complete invoice lifecycle of receiving, coding, approving, and paying.
The smart data extraction technology pulls all key information from invoices such as invoice date, number, amount, and vendor details. Everything gets captured without manual data entry. Also, the software has a payment module that handles both check payments and electronic fund transfers if your bank supports EFT. That means payments can go out immediately once the invoices are approved. Also, LeapAP connects directly to utility company portals and downloads invoices automatically.
For example, the system logs into your utility accounts, such as electricity, water, and gas bills, and pulls invoices without human intervention. And the software has no limit to the number of properties or units you can manage. When it comes to records management, the platform comes with a Mass Download feature that lets you export all invoices matching specific search criteria. This saves hours during month-end reporting and audit preparation.
Yardi Bill Pay focuses specifically on automating vendor payments rather than the entire accounts payable process. If you're already using Yardi Voyager or Yardi Breeze, then Bill Pay might feel like a natural extension of your existing workflow. Here's how it works: If the vendor has banking details on file, Bill Pay sends out an EFT payment. If not, it automatically prints and mails a physical check on your behalf. It saves you the hassle of printing checks at your office, stuffing envelopes, and trips to the post office.
Basically, the strength of Yardi Bill Pay lies in its integration with Yardi's Procure to Pay Suite. Everything flows seamlessly within the Voyager ecosystem. Payments, approvals, and vendor updates all stay in sync. When a payment goes out, it shows up in real time in Voyager. That kind of integration reduces errors and saves your team a ton of reconciliation work. It also helps during audits.
Since the system logs payments instantly, you don't have to go through lots of papers and cross-checking spreadsheets to verify what went where. That said, its biggest strength is also its biggest limitation: Yardi Bill Pay is essentially married to the Yardi platform. If you're already invested in Yardi's ecosystem, Bill Pay makes perfect sense. But if you're using a different ERP or accounting system, switching your entire accounting system just to use Bill Pay makes no sense.
AvidXchange is another big player in the AP automation space with more than 8,500 clients across the U.S. and has processed payments for over 965,000 suppliers. It uses OCR to extract invoice data from scanned files, emails, and EDI feeds, then runs everything through your pre-set approval rules. You can set up multi-level workflows based on dollar amounts, departments, and vendor types. AvidXchange supports multiple payment methods like ACH, paper checks, and virtual credit cards.
Another thing you'll love about AvidXchange is its integration depth. It integrates with over 220 accounting and ERP platforms. That means you probably won't need to change your existing financial software. The system syncs data both ways, keeping everything aligned without duplicate entry. But I've discovered some significant weaknesses.
The first one is visibility. Once someone on the team approves an invoice, they can't track it anymore. Only managers retain access to view approved invoices and track payment status. This creates audit nightmares as approvers can't pull their own documentation during year-end reviews. They bombard managers with requests for invoice copies and payment confirmations. The second issue is customer support. There's no phone number, and there's no live agent. It's just automated email responses and a support portal. It's so hard to get in touch with a human when issues arise.
NetSuite AP Automation Software is embedded inside its ERP system. It gives you full procure-to-pay automation: invoice matching, approval workflows, and automated journal entries. Since it's built natively into NetSuite, you won't have to deal with connection headaches and data sync issues that plague many third-party solutions. The system automates invoice review, approval, and payment processes while maintaining complete visibility within your existing NetSuite environment.
It captures vendor records, manages purchase requests, and automatically matches invoices to purchase orders and vendor information. Then the system has automated journal entries. It posts debits and credits automatically when invoices get approved and the payments are processed. This eliminates manual accounting entries and reduces the chance of posting errors that can throw off your books. However, this tight integration comes with the biggest constraint.
NetSuite's AP automation runs through SuiteBanking, which extends the platform's capabilities with smart document recognition, OCR data capture, customizable approval workflows, and document indexing. That means you can't use NetSuite AP automation if you're not already using NetSuite as your primary ERP. And if you choose to overhaul your entire financial system and switch to NetSuite, it also has its weaknesses. For example, NetSuite's user interface has a steep learning curve and unintuitive navigation.